because youve lost 300 grand does that mean hull have to sell players to recoup the money or will pearson have to put in 300 of his own money

Only at hull FC could losing 300 grand with more to come be a good thing. You've all spent ages telling us what a magnificent profitable organisation you are.

Seems it was all built on sand foundations

Whoopsie

Most of the dobbin comments on this thread are absolute Comedy Gold
It never fails to amaze me how stupid some of them are

TBF we don't have much choice.

Just like i said there would be more bad news to come and it has, wonder if mrs Barista would like to go and dig into the accounts and tell us all how profitable her club are?????????? Thought not

I think we made £250k from the 2008 Final.

The lack of any Cup run in the last three seasons has had a big effect. A Wembley return would be a huge boost financially.

The £300k loss is unfortunate but was inevitable given the drop in crowds (down about 17,000 in total between 2010 and 2011) and lack of success however if we can turn things around on the pitch the financial picture will improve without the need for any soft loans.

BTW loving the dim Rovers fans posting on here.

Now, now. Losses of £1.9m over 6 years, net liabilities of £2.1m, £1m loan from Allam, ERDF funding not yet signed off on the North Stand, and the marquee signing of, er, Graeme Horne. Are you sure you don't want to trade?

This is where a lot of your lot are getting mistaken, we have been a profitable business. What Pearson is getting at is that these profits were made on an unrealistic cost base. He wants us to be a profitable business while spending appropriately, that will take time.

Come on, since when have facts got in the way of the dobbins trolling.

It doesn't even get in the way of Blunderside's trolling. They, like the idiots on the dark side, are still convinced that capitalising players on the balance sheet has an impact on the P&L account

I'm sure mrs b can bring up one of our many debates on where the cash was going