To be fair, Hame didn't actually give away any penalties. I was more concerned that he'd end up binned for retaliation.

it certainly did, although replays suggest we were lucky to get the first decision.

Although not Hame's, it cost us two points as a result of a penalty, not two points as in the game.

We've been lacking controlled aggression for too long. Perhaps all Hame needs is to control his aggression. Remember that he's missed a lot of game time in the last year.

Plus it was worth it to see the gobby pseudo-hardcase Morrision going backwards at a rate of knots.

what about the penalty from the scrum? was that against the full pack? what was goodwin accusing hame of?

Yup. That's why I only said he needs to calm down a little bit. Good to see the passion, just needs to be a little careful.


Oh yes.

thats all i'm saying

It was probably easier for the referee to award a penalty to Hull in the circumstances at that end of the field rather than give Bradford the opportunity to take the lead again for a nothing incident.

i think he missed the first swinging arm off hame.

Silverwood was asked by Tickle what that was for. Unbelievably he said Hame "was going in heavy". What a load of cack. Referee totally made that up.

Think he accused him of biting. Not sure though.

So what ? It wasn't clear anyway. Getting in amongst the opposition is one of the big things we have been missing. Another is lacking anybody who will take the job of organising the team. Horne was the only 'recognised' half in the team and as usual he totally failed to take the game. As Kosh says he needs some very serious work in the off season. If we don't sign Moa we must sign a top SO.

Anyone listening to KCFM? The Doyle is having a right old whinge about the ref. I didn't think he was that bad TBH, one decision aside.

Agar also hinting that the ref cost us the game.

whats going on here? why the yness?