I disagree. I think there's only room in the 17 for 2 from Dowes/Cusack/Radford. When there are 2 of them on the pitch at the same time we are noticeably weaker attacking the line.

Not at all.

In terms of technique they are the best two props Hull have imho.

BTW did O'Meley play today???

DRUNK OR MENTALLY CHALLENGED

technique?

They showed it today!

Moa should have played in front of dowes, radford and cusack

That's probably true, but both are in woeful form at the moment and Moa should have been ahead of both them and Radford if we are playing people on form as stated at the beginning of the season.

Has Agar ever dropped Radford? Not sure TBH. I think that Agar's "senior leadership group" or whatever he calls it includes Radders, Dowes and Cusack.

Probably because they have been coming from the bench, something their styles are not suited to.

Without trailing through the whole thread, seems a very strange decision to leave him out. Thought he made some good impact last week, albeit in his limited minutes on the pitch.

If i was Sam i'd rip up my contract. What a waste of time it has been signing him. Clearly Agar has his favourates and will only pick players like Sam if and only if there are injuries.

Sorry Sam but you should have gone elsewhere

O'Meley starts that's a vive, Moa from the bench then fit in the next two props who can play in the roles.

Dowes has been awful!

Picked up an injury today according to Agar so Moa may get in next week.

If i was Sam I'd tell him to fook off and pick one of his bum boys in Dowes, Yak or Radders.