keepin an eye on you....

















....and waitin for the Brother to kick start the revolution



ONWARD MARCH EVERYONE

Because he is clearly out of his depth, the interchanges and tactics are evidence enough, he should never have been in the position in the first place.



Who cares? Is he going to recompense me for my expenses for attending the game? No, it's a results business, he has not even accepted that he may shoulder some of the blame, nor has he apologised. The buck stops with him.



so, consign another season to the heap because of poor coaching, finish at the bottom, another season of embarassment? No thanks.



The board had confidence that he was cheap, he has never been "the right man for the job", it's why Kath was making decisions last season and they brought Sharp in for this one.

It's not the results per-se, it's the manner of the results and the complete lack of direction, like I said, the buck stops with Agar, hetook the plaudits of a Wembly appearance, he'll have to take the criticism now.

And on that note he is winning more then he is losing in his first full season. Not picking holes in your argument, i'm in agreement with nearly all of what you are saying, i do however feel it may be reasonable to give him an opprtunity to turn this around before he is fully condemned.

So if he doesn't apologise, do we pay him all season for sitting in the stands? Can't see that swearing is grounds for witholding his pay.

Don't you want your players to be pi$$ed off when subbed, it shows a bit of passion surely.

Better than paying a player doing porridge!

I guess I am just angry about yesterday, we looked apathetic and disinterested. We are out of the CC, we will not struggle the top 6 playing lik we have been, and I see no sign that Agar can change that.

How long do we give him, and more importantly, who comes in, I'd hate to have Sharp as head coach.

Agree wholeheartedly, I bet Moa doesn't moan when he finishes his weekly quarter!

My principal concern and the overarching factor in which i continue to back Agar as i'm sure that will be the inevitable and longterm replacement.

the way i see the club is...

in the blue corner: agar, rule, hetherington, sutton and co

and in the red corner: the players

and sat outside the ring, jon sharp, thinkin, do i get in the ring but to which corner??

But lets say we loose the next 10. We could on this form. How would we get rid of Agar and his THREE YEAR deal!

I know he's cheap, but 3 years of cheep must add up to something!

Totally agree. When we're lacking passion we need someone to fire us up. TBH when I heard the story I thought it would be better to hit Thacks in the pocket rather than suspend him, given his recent past.