Was at work so didn't see it.....saw it yesterday as was there and it was a straight red for me.

2 Things.
1 Convenient that isn't it.
2 Learn the rules of RL.

Convenient that I was at work and didn't see it....my,sorry for having the gall to have a job.Learn the. Rules...I do know that tripping isn't a straight red as was changed but my opinion,on a HULL FC internet opinion forum is that it should be a red.

How convenient that I disagree with you

You can think it 'should' be all you want the FACT is that it isn't chief.
You want to be thankful really or you could have had another player sent off earlier in the season.

Or are we playing 'Different rules for FC'?

We'll if this player did trip then he should have walked...it should be a red for all players...how's that?....as for different rules...give over dopey....everyone knows that's reserved for the bigger clubs.....Mcllorums head high on peacock and suttons spear tackle or didn't you see them.

Yet on another thread you seem to be hinting that Yeaman on Burns without the ball is fine.
No doubt if the boot on the other foot you would be screaming blue murder.

I wouldn't bother Kosh......he sees what he wants too see

Oh the irony

No it wasn't.
It was a poor decision against us which started Hulls mini revival.

Bolloxs.......

tripping is creeping into the game quite a bit now and I also believe it should be stamped out quickly. The problem is some trips are more blatant than others so its hard to tell whether there intentional or not.

Good point,some disguise it as the "Cumberland throw"

A strong opinion from one who claims not to have seen the game