He was a superb player when fit, but unfortunately, we cannot play with 12 players and no playmaker. He had to be cut loose. No-one moaned when Chester or Eagar were released and they were regulars to the physio.

They got a bit more notice and support than Dykes though.

I've seen this sentiment mentioned a few times but I never really understood... how was he treated?

I don't think there was anything wrong, he was simply released because the club felt he carried too many injuries. Saying that, even with a biscuit body, he still put it on the line and still put some good hits in.

He was a very good player but spent too much time injured to justify his salary and a quota spot. Sorry but there's no room for sentiment in these situations.

Oh I don't disagree with the decision, just how it was handled, I'm not going into it as Adam himself said it was "water under the bridge" when I last spoke to him, it seems we were kinder to Byrne/Motu etc. (even King), a lesson learnt.

Wouldn't disagree with that. What about Sid Domic? I always thought he was bundled out of the building a bit sharpish.

I agree, i would love to have another player like Sid Domic i think he has been greatly missed and was never truly replaced.

He's always been an impact sub in Oz. Dont think Agar knows how to use him.

Does he?

Couple of times yesterday he did and last week.