I pay £11.99 a month and think it's well worth it, especially this year. It's the slightly more expensive package but the on demand section is accessible to watch any past game that season, whereas the other just stays online for a week I think.

I was happy enough with the NRL coverage,but now they have the Toronto games too, I will be more than happy with the cost.

Premier is sky sports number 428

should attract more fans i think, have the club realised fans wont pay £16 to watch kids?

James Smailes ‏@James_Smailes 16m16 minutes ago
They weren't expected to field a strong side Sunday, but I'm hearing #HullFC now planning on playing a host of seniors against @TOwolfpack

I'm holding fire until he announces the team to decide. It's all well and good playing the kids but when you've paid full whack to see them get stuffed against Cas and again against Rovers i'll watch them get stuffed again in the comfort of my living room via Premier.

Or get a zgemma box with all the channels for free

They're great aren't they. Wouldn't be without mine now.

... or to put it another way, stolen.

sky have been robbing me for years

It's not just sky though.
There'll be plenty of poor souls wondering why their broadband charges are so high, and it'll because people are accessing their fully paid for boxes, and stealing services from them.

Spot on pal. To watch Super League I'm having to pay a subscription that goes straight into the pockets of average millionaire footballers. Footballers who no doubt got a pay rise following Sky's obscene successful bid for the latest rights. It's even more galling that they no longer show the NRL or the Championship (apart from the Blackpool Bash) although always seem to show a plethora of obscure RU competitions.

Definitely the way forward

Yeh , about time sky came up with a sport package without football, like you say , thats what we are paying for. And I cant watch the over paid pansies, complete shiiiiiiiite