Have you?



Sounds crazy, but wouldn't surprise me if the RFL tried to.

Surely we should know the rules? Why would we make a player available that would be ineligible?
Useless to us now if he can't get a game anywhere.

That must be correct.

Well if we are in the frame 2 other Super League clubs must be too.

No

2 other clubs are bulls and giants

there's no chance we will get a points deduction as nothing that went on affected our performance on the pitch. It is more likely Donny that would get this as they could be seen to benefit, esp as they won their game

The RFL may be incompetent but they aren't [icompletely[/i bonkers. Trying to pin the penalty for playing an ineligible player on the team not responsible for picking that player nor benefiting in any way from him being played qualifies as completely bonkers in my book. And completely unenforceable.

I agree, but problem is that we are benefiting from him playing, that's the point of the whole agreement.

We didn't, we lost at keighley.

Dewsbury and Batley won their games

What should be under investigation is the numpty who dreamed up the dual-reg scenario in the first place

I can see the logic in preventing clubs from strengthening their team for the last few games, in the same way as transfer deadlines work,
but I cannot find any reference to "must have played 3 matches before a deadline date " anywhere on the RFL website.