Why? cooke's knowledge of the game is summarised in one action which saw his career go down the pan. If he were half as knowledgeable as he believes he is he'd probably still be playing for Hull and would be significantly better off that he is now.

My only hope is that these marathons he's running see him disappear for a few months afterwards

Just like fellow marathon runner Paula Radcliffe, Cooke too has p!ssed it all away in public...

Just remind who Paul Cooke plays for again??

Unfortunately, even if he kept running, that only leaves him just over 183.5 miles away.

Still too close

Doc's one of the few still willing to try and defend him over the way he left the club as well. Keeps going on about not all the facts being known.

Dear old Doc is still recoverihg from what he thinks was the disaster of Agar leaving too.

Well, firstly - welcome to last week. Secondly - he said it to get a bite, which he got at the time.
Lastly, his idea of bringing a back in and pushing Turner into the back row allowing tickle to play prop wasn't really that stupid, was it?
As for doc, nobody does know the full facts, do they? I don't trust Cookies word, but I don't trust the other sides either.

Did he? Or is he just using the tried and tested excuse of folk on the internet who make knobs of themselves?


Why move three players around when you can just drop one in?


I don't trust anyone's word. The publicly available facts are enough to demonstrate what a knob Cooke is.

Myself and a few others on here were tweeting with Cookie about this. When I asked him who else he would play instead of Radford, he said 'Crooks, Cunningham or Nicklas'. I don't believe any of them can play prop. Shows what he knows.

But that's not what he meant was it Tom? You know that.

But that one wasn't part of the squad, was he? Which was kind of Cookes point.

Oh well nice to know he's ONLY punching keys nowadays!!! Really though who gives a monkeys chuff what that buffoon thinks about anything in life?