Can't disagree but why name a leeds loanee in the 19 man squad and not Hall? agar should have seen what playing FB was doing to Hall's game the first time he had a wobble instead of playing him another 2 or 3 times and crucifying him.

Compare to thorman, Hall's performances have been good

I haven't heard much about him in the reserves, but he won't be kicking goals for the first team. Not in the near future anyway.

broughton is in the 19 man squad every week

Oh i see your point.
Is Broughton playing in the hull reserves?

Nope.
Hall plays week-in, week-out at left centre in the reserves, though.


Also, an injured Stuart Reardon, who hadn't gone as far as to complete a medical for the club was picked ahead of Hall.

money simple as! hes on a gd contract here!. but yes why the hell isnt he being picked!

I think that he'd rather be playing than on good money and playing in the reserves each week. He could get the same money at several other clubs, but the difference is that they would play him.

Well i would say it is more Richard Agar's dislike of not playing Radford at 13, instead of his dislike of Hall.

Does hall get a bonus if he has a certain amount of apperances - just a thought

You can't say that, how do you know.
Perhaps he wants to stay at Hull because he is from Hull? Did you think of that? lol

A good thing about Hall not playing is that my friend who I go to the games with is "in love" with him (don't ask me why), so I get to rib her about it every week.
The highlight of a depressing 80 minutes.

If he wants to stay in Hull though he may as well go look for another job, as long as agar plate's here.

And I reckon that teams like Crusaders, Salford, or most teams with a good coach would be willing to have him. He has potential, and under the right coaching he could be a good player.

However, under our coaching....