Because you are a bitter deluded fool

Yeah that will be the reason, not because they can fit more fans in and earn more money.

No because your chairman loves scoring cheap points and Bill Land would not have acted as he does now.

Says the man with an avatar and signature of a hidebound stalker.

Like I said bitter and deluded

Neil Hudgell does what's best for Hull Kingston Rovers and the fact that's made a decent fist of it so far is what upsets you.


Far too precious

He has more agendas than Blind Pugh.

I truly hate Rovers and ANY advantage they gain gets the big from me and I couldn't find a thumbs down

Even if it penalises your club?

A trade off Sheldon , which is worse ? our loss or their gain , I see their gain as more from playing at KC than ours so my internal thought process says NO - I don't doubt my gut reaction

Why are you bothered anyway as you are in Sydney

So both clubs could gain but you'd trade that for both clubs to lose?

Because first and foremost i'm a rugby league fan.

I want the game to be as strong as possible in as many countries as possible, I don't take delight in Hkr or any other RL side making massive losses and face going under.

I don't understand why you'd punish your own club just because it would punish your closest rivals.

What I want to know is, why all of a sudden are Rovers wanting to do this. I know they are rumours of the loss of the Golf Stand but they haven't exactly sold out a derby at there place with it anyway. With the lack of movement on there North stand and it appears no one knows were Mr Allams money has gone I wonder if Rovers are in serious financial trouble. They is no way a few years ago Rovers would have wanted to do this, so why the sudden change of heart ?

The bottom line is the directors "personal loans" are coming to an end. Getting a 20,000 crowd at the KC could really help Rovers achieve over 10k average and help them break even. The mind ponders.

How could we gain ? not financially I am sure , only by playing at home and for what is in it for rovers I don't want it.
Let's face it - allam owns SMC and Hudge owes 1 million to Allam. Pearson needs Allam to renegootiate on SMC agreement so we can make more money at FC . SO Allam leans on Hudge and Pearson leans on Hudge and Luca Brotska leans and low and behold Hudge asks for derby at KC so the extra 'spend' goes into different coffers.