Agreed, but Radford is too much of a coward to go toe to toe with Bails. Hence why he started on him when he was defenceless.

you aint seen radders in the ring then????

what an odd thread which player is harder than which .....

I don't think even you believe that. Judging by the look on his face, I reckon he would have done. Would have been an interesting start to the match!

Why did he attack a defenceless Bailey on the floor then? Why not let him stand up, PTB and give him a punch then?

Without doubt the most hilarious post of the year. Absolute comedy gold.

Without wishing to get into the whole 'who is harder the who' debate, he'd just been elbowed in the head 3 or 4 times. He probably didn't give the matter a whole lot of rational thought. I feel sure there are few players Radford would be frightened to go toe to toe with.

And Bailey was only defenceless because he decided to curl up into a foetal position and cover his head rather than getting up to fight.

Can get more, but would be very unusual

Could, but would be outside the recommended guidelines.

So, is this an act of thuggery on Radford's behalf? Attacking a defenseless person? Yes.

Bails was only trying to protect himself from the 'punches' of Radford.

You're getting boring now.

Go away

He never got charged so I think we should draw a line under this now.