If you [iperform[/i better over a given period of time then you have [ibeen[/i better over that same period of time.

It really isn't a difficult concept.

The form and class comparison is actually pretty relevant, in that form is measurable in an objective fashion whereas class is a subjective judgement.

You don't win anything for being classy, mind.

Nope. The assertion that we are the 4th best team [iright now[/i is a fact easily demonstrated by a glance at the league table.

No. The league shows you how strong you have been over the period up to and including your last game.

In what way doesn't it tally?

I said that w'd get bogged down against the bottom placed club and we did, which proves my point that league positions aren't irrefutable evidence of how good or poor a team is

Possibly you could point out where anyone has even mentioned Agar, much less defended him?

So the team in the higher position didn't beat the team in the lower position?

League position now gives an idication ovviously but isn't definitive proof.

Are you really saying that a team could be 3rd best team one week, 4th best the next and 2nd best the week after?

It's a completely flawed argument

It's not though because evry team has played a different combination of games

You do know the difference between the map and the territory don't you?

Didn't in tonight's match did they. How the hell can that happen? the 2nd best team in the league losing to the 5th best. What a crazy world we live in

wolfie did about 5 pages back

So what? That's the way the league is structured. For most of it's existence the team winning the competition will have played a different combination of games over the course of the season. Does that mean that we've never had a valid champion?