FORUMS FORUMS



  
FORUMS > Hull FC > Clubs Reject Restructuring - (Oh no they didn't !!)
267 posts in 19 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, Kosh , Roland_R , Karen
RankPostsTeam
International Star2015
JoinedServiceReputation
Jun 201311 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jul 2016Jul 2016LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: The Dentist Wilf "Completely agree and I'll hazard a guess what the massive issues are.

Its not so much the structure that is the problem but rather if more money goes to the Championship Clubs where does that come from, if its not to be to the detriment of the Super League Clubs, its about even more importantly how the RL govern the game, why we haven't got a Sponsor for Super League or the World Cup, how our administration is happy to settle for pictures on the side of a lorry instead of tackling the 'moral' issues of an offer of nearly £1m from a betting company, how much money the Sky deal actually generates and how much is passed onto the Clubs (and how much of that is retained by Redhall) which Chairman if any have any sort of vested interest in the proposed changes, how a subject that it has been agreed in writing by the RL to be discussed after the World Cup is suddenly on the agenda as an urgent item at a run of the mill Super league meeting.

Its about getting the entrepeneurs who own the Clubs involved in marketing the game on a national stage, getting better tv deals, being transparent when handouts are given by the governing body to Clubs who are struggling and how we can plicate a players union and act in a caring way towards players who are now k*ackered after 30 games who will under the new structure be expoected to play a lot more etc. etc. etc.

You wont get shot down by me,your spot on.


Exactly right,you wont get shot down by me either.
RankPostsTeam
Player Coach197No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 200817 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Sep 2015Sep 2015LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: The Dentist Wilf "Completely agree and I'll hazard a guess what the massive issues are.

Its not so much the structure that is the problem but rather if more money goes to the Championship Clubs where does that come from, if its not to be to the detriment of the Super League Clubs, its about even more importantly how the RL govern the game, why we haven't got a Sponsor for Super League or the World Cup, how our administration is happy to settle for pictures on the side of a lorry instead of tackling the 'moral' issues of an offer of nearly £1m from a betting company, how much money the Sky deal actually generates and how much is passed onto the Clubs (and how much of that is retained by Redhall) which Chairman if any have any sort of vested interest in the proposed changes, how a subject that it has been agreed in writing by the RL to be discussed after the World Cup is suddenly on the agenda as an urgent item at a run of the mill Super league meeting.

Its about getting the entrepeneurs who own the Clubs involved in marketing the game on a national stage, getting better tv deals, being transparent when handouts are given by the governing body to Clubs who are struggling and how we can plicate a players union and act in a caring way towards players who are now k*ackered after 30 games who will under the new structure be expoected to play a lot more etc. etc. etc.

For me there are too many questions that want answering before we go blindly into a re-structuring which is fine as far as the 8 x 8 x 8 stuff is concerned if if you like that complicated sort of thing but you can't vote on it until the finance is agreed and sorted and the governance of the game clear and transparent. All we'll end up with is moving the deckchairs on the deck while the ship continues to go down. The World Cup is a big opportunity to talk up the game and get new converts this is a watershed moment and looks pretty massive to me!!!

Of course I'll get shot down now but I love this game, its fans and the folks who play it and at present it is grossly undersold and badly administered and sinking as a commercial entity very fast indeed.'"



Completely agree.

On the sponsorship issue and the problems associated with aligning with a betting company, simply donating a percentage of the money to a gambling awareness charity could have been an easy feel good fix and helped to fend off criticism. Too many other sports have jumped into bed with the gambling industry to be judgmental about it. Like it or not it has become a big part of sport in the last decade.

RankPostsTeam
International Star2015
JoinedServiceReputation
Jun 201311 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jul 2016Jul 2016LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



You wont get shot down by me,spot on post. eusa_clap.gif

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach5410No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 200717 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Sep 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: FCFaithful Stu "Completely agree.

On the sponsorship issue and the problems associated with aligning with a betting company, simply donating a percentage of the money to a gambling awareness charity could have been an easy feel good fix and helped to fend off criticism. Too many other sports have jumped into bed with the gambling industry to be judgmental about it. Like it or not it has become a big part of sport in the last decade.'"


Beggars can’t be choosers and all that, we need sponsorship badly and add to that the additional publicity that a betting company can add to the sport with advertising ‘specials ‘ and the like. We should have jumped at it.
There are very few sponsors that won’t have a moral no go to them and if we’re being that choosy then we are completely lost.

I do fear for the game and adding the 8x8x8 will only make the sport into more of a novelty sport than ever. It just pangs of desperation and amateurism.

ccs
RankPostsTeam
International Star5318
JoinedServiceReputation
Aug 201113 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Aug 2022Aug 2022LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Meeting scheduled for tomorrow (Tuesday).

Quote: Sporting Life "It is thought most of the Super League representatives are keen on a a reduction to 12, with Huddersfield and Hull KR known to favour a 10-team division'"
.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach11614
JoinedServiceReputation
Aug 200519 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



hetheringto pleading with the rebel clubs to change their minds and accept the proposals, i do hope Pearson and the other 5 chairman hold out and tell him to do one!

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach7401No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 200519 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



I completely agree both RL Papers have now consulted with the fans and found a vast majority against but the fact is they'll take no notice of us, we'll get no chance to have our say, Pearson, Hudge and Co have fought a good fight but Gary and Kath will I believe win the day in the end.

RankPostsTeam
Club Coach295No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 200420 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Dec 2016Jun 2016LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



they need at least 10 members to vote it through.
so if Wigan,Warrington, Hull and Hull KR hold firm they only need one other defeat the proposal. that could be either Huddersfield or Salford as i think Saints will fall in to the so called line.

RankPostsTeam
Moderator12647
JoinedServiceReputation
Jun 200717 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED

Moderator


Quote: The Dentist Wilf "I completely agree both RL Papers have now consulted with the fans and found a vast majority against but the fact is they'll take no notice of us, we'll get no chance to have our say, Pearson, Hudge and Co have fought a good fight but Gary and Kath will I believe win the day in the end.'"


How did the papers phrase the question? If it was only for or against, then it isn't necessarily very meaningful - as the 1up-and-down and franchising vote might be bigger together, but smaller individually. If it was a choice between the 2 options on the table or 3 8s only got 20% or something, then fair enough.

RankPostsTeam
Moderator12647
JoinedServiceReputation
Jun 200717 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED

Moderator


Quote: sparky1963 "they need at least 10 members to vote it through.
so if Wigan,Warrington, Hull and Hull KR hold firm they only need one other defeat the proposal. that could be either Huddersfield or Salford as i think Saints will fall in to the so called line.'"


I think they've already agreed that there should be a change, which was clearly necessary. I think it might just be a straight majority/most votes thing.
The options being...

3 x 8
1 up and 1 down
Abstain

RankPostsTeam
Club Coach295No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 200420 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Dec 2016Jun 2016LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



not according to the voting rules of the super league there has to be at least 10 votes in favour,
Its the same voting structure that scottish football has when they had issues on restructuring last year when 2 clubs stopped everything been sorted for nearly 4 months.

RankPostsTeam
Moderator12647
JoinedServiceReputation
Jun 200717 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED

Moderator


Quote: sparky1963 "not according to the voting rules of the super league there has to be at least 10 votes in favour,
Its the same voting structure that scottish football has when they had issues on restructuring last year when 2 clubs stopped everything been sorted for nearly 4 months.'"


To make a change, I think. But that was agreed last July.

www.mirror.co.uk/sport/rugby-lea ... ut-2043728

That articles and others indicated that it was just which of 2 changes the sport should go for, and the only sensible way to do that without risking stalemate (which we can't afford either), is a simple most votes approach.

While it is an important battle, as I reckon NH and AP are genuinely very ambivalent about the system and deeply unhappy with the proposed division of Central revenue, there are other ways to bring about some of the changes in governance they want to see.
Quote: sparky1963 "not according to the voting rules of the super league there has to be at least 10 votes in favour,
Its the same voting structure that scottish football has when they had issues on restructuring last year when 2 clubs stopped everything been sorted for nearly 4 months.'"


To make a change, I think. But that was agreed last July.

www.mirror.co.uk/sport/rugby-lea ... ut-2043728

That articles and others indicated that it was just which of 2 changes the sport should go for, and the only sensible way to do that without risking stalemate (which we can't afford either), is a simple most votes approach.

While it is an important battle, as I reckon NH and AP are genuinely very ambivalent about the system and deeply unhappy with the proposed division of Central revenue, there are other ways to bring about some of the changes in governance they want to see.


RankPostsTeam
International Star5202
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 201213 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jan 2018Jan 2018LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



rlrl

I've got abad feeling about this tbh

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach7401No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 200519 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: ccs "Meeting scheduled for tomorrow (Tuesday).

.'"



That's to start a series of discussions on governance but the actual structure meeting is on Friday. Looks like Koukash is on the turn! icon_biggrin.gif

www.newsnow.co.uk/A/689841859?-4338:2393
Quote: ccs "Meeting scheduled for tomorrow (Tuesday).

.'"



That's to start a series of discussions on governance but the actual structure meeting is on Friday. Looks like Koukash is on the turn! icon_biggrin.gif

www.newsnow.co.uk/A/689841859?-4338:2393


RankPostsTeam
Moderator12647
JoinedServiceReputation
Jun 200717 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED

Moderator


Quote: The Dentist Wilf "That's to start a series of discussions on governance but the actual structure meeting is on Friday. Looks like Koukash is on the turn!
To have got that first on the agenda is something of a result for Hudgell and Pearson. Personally I'm glad it is two separate meetings.

Apparently if there is failure to agree a new structure, the temporary default is to stay at 14 with 2 up and 2 down.
www.sportinglife.com/rugby-leagu ... the-agenda
Quote: The Dentist Wilf "That's to start a series of discussions on governance but the actual structure meeting is on Friday. Looks like Koukash is on the turn!
To have got that first on the agenda is something of a result for Hudgell and Pearson. Personally I'm glad it is two separate meetings.

Apparently if there is failure to agree a new structure, the temporary default is to stay at 14 with 2 up and 2 down.
www.sportinglife.com/rugby-leagu ... the-agenda


267 posts in 19 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, Kosh , Roland_R , Karen
267 posts in 19 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, Kosh , Roland_R , Karen



All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.

Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.

RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.

Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM

You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.



Please Support RLFANS.COM


10.4111328125:10
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
7s
Salary Cap Changes Blocked - 11 votes to 1
NickyKiss
9
15s
Game - Song Titles
Boss Hog
40802
16s
Shopping list for 2025
HU8HFC
5588
24s
Pre Season - 2025
Hullrealist
191
27s
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
Theeaststand
4048
35s
Opening Championship and League One Fixtures for 2025 Released
RLFANS News
1
43s
ALL NEW 49ERS ERA LEEDS UTD THREAD
tad rhino
2611
45s
Rumours and signings v9
Mark_P1973
28902
47s
Film game
karetaker
5766
1m
How many games will we win
Shifty Cat
48
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Shirt reveal coming soon
Khlav Kalash
2
TODAY
Opening Championship and League One Fixtures for 2025 Released
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
Getting a new side to gel
Wigan Bull
2
TODAY
Fixtures
Hockley Bron
12
TODAY
Writers required
H.G.S.A
1
TODAY
2025 Fixtures
Jemmo
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS