Then went on to win the next 13 games

Check the website

Did he?

Agar himself claims to have had little to do with our winning run. The players, having got rid of Kear, knuckled down and fought for each other. There were no significant changes to the team or the way they played. Agar's contribution was to basically stand back and let them get on with it.

Wasn't sharp in charge by then?

And when did PS arrive?

Its wrong.......Sharp was here for the Wigan match but let Agar continue with it.

well he did did contribute then, he managed it as he saw fit, wonder who picked the squad, the waterboy maybe:lol:

The squad was the same as when Kear was picking it.

I agree and disagree, the players attitude was poor under Kear and they obviously wanted to impress their new coach also...but I think Sharp deserves some credit for sorting the defense and intensity out, we started playing for 80mins every week whereas even under Kear we'd blow hot and cold and lose games we were dominating (managing to lose a 16 or 18-0 lead at half time to wigan at home in 2005 being a prime example)

unfortunately for Sharp and the club Sharp isn't a head coach (rubbish with the media, poor recruitment) but I still think he'd be a good coach or assistant for somebody

A lot of different accounts here
Sharpe arrived
Sharpe let Agar carry on
Kear picked the team, and then the team picked themselves








As much as it may pain some Agar did play a massive part in us reaching the G/final that year.

Doubt it but a couple of top signings would point us in the right direction.

In fact they dont have to even be top signings, if we had Brett Hodgson and Dobson in our side for next season we would be challenging IMO.

These two werent top signings just good ones in the correct positions.

I do believe Richard Swain had more influence in getting Hull to the GF than either Agar or Peter Sharp.

exactly, signing the big name isn't always the best option