While I agree he shouldn't be doing the full 80, he always looks more effective when he starts. So maybe the first half of each half would be better.

He does need a rest in games, been excellent the past two games though, in two very poor team performances.He has a always been a great threat with the ball, but his defence and workrate seems to have improved this season. Made some great hits in defence on sunday.

Best player in the team this year so far in my opinion. Does need spelling I totally agree. At least he has a go and is prepared to put a shot on and not be dominated in the tackle like most of the rest of our players. Great ball to Hall for 1st try on Sunday. One of the few players any opposition will fear at the moment.

Based on his reserve team performances.

I prefer him off the bench but im not fussy, anything as long as he isnt playing 80 mins!!

I wouldn't take performances by seasoned pros in reserve team games as a sign of form, more a sign of fitness.

I'd expect them to show signs of having previously played at a higher level consistently, whether fit or not.

A couple of years ago i would have agreed. But IMO the standard of reserve grade is that low at the moment the only purpose it serves is keeping/getting first team players fit.

Form at that level means absolutely nothing.

Exactly, this was one of the reasons Thorman was brought it to spell Tickle. But I don't think this has happend once this season.

Have to agree manu is better off the bench as he creates more when their forwards are tiring!

And noway should tickle be doing full 80, i was under the impression aswell that that was 1 of the reasons that thorman was brought in

Yes Manu should start on the bench and be an impact player, I said he tires late on and teams run at him and he gets caught out, I would start with Radders,Tickle and Washy with Manu,Lee,Whiting and King on the bench.

Exactly what I just said!