Still been found guilty more times than Radford had a case to answer.... All those stats show is the RFL bias towards Leeds..

How many final warnings does Bailey need to get himself a ban FFS??

rlhttp://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary_item.php?id

rlhttp://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary_item.php?id

rlhttp://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary_item.php?id

And especially this onehttp://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary_item.php?id

just answer me this then.....did you see him a few weeks ago raise his knee into carmonts chest? dead cert ban, theres no defence for that, but did he get a ban? no? why? anyone with half a brain knows bailey is a thug, a cowardly thug at that, watch the dvd with hull, he didnt want to know until all his team mates had hold of radders then he tried a cheap shot of a head butt on longy, he`s just a dirty cu*t, simple as that, so why? i ask again why? has this prick not had a ban this season, i can see aswell as the rest of the rugby league nation of fans (except leeds that is)that he`s a dirty player who gets away with it......also the leeds fans didnt seem to complain much about giving people who throw punches bans when mcdermott belt fielden everytime they met, remember peacock throwing punches in two consecutive games at the start of last season too, came running in throwing in the wcc game, no ban for him either? is there a patten emerging here?????

My point would be, that if he'd been binned and put on report,
they would still haul him up on the same charge with a possible 1 game
ban as this is the appropriate punnishment for the offence in question. So cos he was sent off and missed over 70 mins and never been sent off before how can that not class as the ban? Utter joke.

Luke is off to Salford, not Leeds

Where does it say final warning please? He's had warning letters and formal cautions. Hasn't most players in SL?

Yes. Several.



Very few as many as Bailey. I can't think of any player that has been up in front of the RFL as much as he has and had "No Charge" each time - its very odd.

Without going through the whole of the players, i suspect no one will know.

I suspect that they will have to edit that press release down to single syllable words before the penny drops with most of them on here.

I'd simply point out, that not only did Ryan continue with the game, he ran the ball in hard, tackled well, and surprise, surprise, was not the centre of attention from any aggreived Hull players for the rest of the match!

Surely they weren't scared. After all, the considered intellectual view by all on here is he's a cowardly scum bag.....

Or is the answer more likely to be that as professionals, they and Red Hall recognise a cheap shot assault when they see one?

Do I detect a pattern?.....

The Most Tired Man In Super League

its not only the disciplinary panel that needs looking at, but the consistency of the refs, whereas the ref sent Radford off last week, a different ref may only have sin binned him, another may even have just put it on report, Refs should all be singing from the same hymm sheet,
S.O.S would have been a fair result too.

It's nice that you feel the need to defend him, he usually spends his time hiding behind someone, so why not you? However, if you feel that needling people in the back of the head (only one of his many delightful tactics) is the way the game ought to be played, who am I to contradict you?

ANd the heads of a few paranoid Rhino's fans as well.