Nope. Can't have been that bad as it was penalised (so couldn't have been missed) but not put on report. Would you say it was any worse than the one on Horne at the end of the game (which was completely missed by the official)?

Oh, I forgot. The ref let us off the hook...

Will they look at the one the Salford player did on Briscoe in same match????

Dont talk balls........CLINTS was a damn site worse than Ogres and his ar$e fell out when Fitz went for him...Newton is a cheap shot merchant who cant take it when teams go looking for him.....Looking forward to the return and seeing him fill his pants when the Hull pack give him some.

It was a cowards tackle again by O'Meley in where the opponent couldn't defend themselves, simple as!

If its the same rough tough Hull pack that played yesterday we have nothing at all to worry about.

Like I said if its serious enough the RFL will punish him...What was your comment just out of interest?

Oi, Mr Pot leave the kettle alone!!!!!

Just another defeat then...lol.

End of the day....Newton on report.....O'Meley isnt...go figure which was worse.

Both cheap shots and you know it!

I know R.L. is rough and tough,but I was disappointed in Newton`s tactics of trying to lay out opposing players.He is actually better than that, isn`t he?

They were accidents.

Not condoning any cheap shots mate,it just SEEMED Newton was having a field day.

Yup nothing to worry about apart from losing the game

Rupert pumkin wrote :-

Like I have said, his late shove on Tansey was out of order, his tackling on Hame was fine IMO, doubt he will get pulled up it.

But your not disappointed O'Meley has pulled off the same cheap shot two weeks on the bounce??



Well what about 4th man diver to head VELLA then from the whistle he started ,you had no class so went out to knock players out the game and Galea as good as admited that in the Daily Wail

They have donehttp://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary_item.php?id

O'Meley's wasn't even referred so can't have been that bad.

O'Meley's only crime was going in too aggressive to complete a tackle on someone who had the ball, who (considering he had the ball) would have known there was impact coming.
There was nothing legal about Newton's off-the-ball charge on Tansey from behind, who (considering he wasn't even facing the same direction and didn't even have the ball) was defenceless.

Which one is cowardly?

The one that got put on report, that's which one. And you even gained an advantage from it because the idiot referee brought the game back 60m for it, so how the Rovers fans can complain about being hard done to is beyond me...


...except for another loss.

Of course people are disappointed. It conceded a penalty. But he was trying to affect a tackle and just went in too aggressive. It's completely different to someone hitting people off the ball, butting/elbowing in other players on the ground, etc. as they can't really say they were trying to do anything else but break the rules. Your tactics blatantly involved breaking the rules. That's why it was so much sweeter that you lost.

Maybe Galea is so p*ssed about Lauaki not getting binned because the tactics were "get them down to 12 men, and then maybe we might have a chance of scoring!"