Moa would give more yardage than Cusack but the Yak put in a great defensive effort against Saints. I would say stay the same, the full 17 deserve another shot. The only possible exception might be Houghton.

fair shout in my book too!
however i recal Agar saying at the last forum that he plans to rotate forwards to keep them all fresh unless injuries dictate!!
Moa is a worthy replacement but he is just that a replacement guys, but to drop a Cussack with his stats to fit him in would be madness, especially when we have go forward from so many other areas now!!
Cussacks brief will be to ghost Crabby i am sure of it and bang him every time he touches the ball, and Luaki on Griffin will be the other match up!!

i was there and il say it again cusack is a good solid pro who will graft in attack and defence but nothing more. 1 of the reasons why our pack was weak and soft last year was the pack was unbalenced to many so called grafters workhorses and not enough impact big front rower. give moa a game and see how he goes if he dosent perform then he wont get in the team simple as but most importantly we need to get the balance right within the team and pack and to me that means 2 impact props which would be omeely and moa with dowes and radders as our grafters playing longer minutes. then theres lauaki who can fill in at prop but would leave in the secound row.

you just dont get what im saying do you im not saying cusack is crap im just saying that we need to get the right balance in the pack and for me that means 1 of dowes, radders and cusack would be dropped for moa to give us impact and some pure aggresion.

Which we had plenty of against Saints to be leading 26-0 without Moa!

I really don't get people wanting anything to change, the 17 that played at Saints showed more pride, passion, comittment and ability than we saw last season, barring injuries, keep it the same.

i hope agar picks moa lets see how he goes if he dosent perform then drop him but im more then confident heel perform.

Nuff said

well i know some people wanted calderwood to come in the team if he was fit to replace hall. what would you do because no matter what the same 17 should play shoundt they

Would leave Hall on the wing, he did nothing wrong. but calderwood won't be available.......will he

i know he aint available but was saying if he was would you drop hall for calderwood becasue i know i would. it would be harsh on hall becasue he dint do nowt wrong but calderwood would offer alot more to the team.