Great news but we lost the game, a critical game, predominantly because we were down on energy in the last ten minutes because we had played a man short since the first half.

We've been robbed again by the officials, after last week and Burrows not getting ten minutes for what was nothing short of an assault on Connor but then being charged afterwards and it happening at a time when we could have gone on to win the game for me at the very least it's just unfair!

Its worrying that the best referee in Super league is Bentham yet it was his call as the video ref that gets Watts sent off and possibly costs us the match.

Would love it if they refs had to apologise to the player and the club for these sort of incidents. Couldn't get to the game as I'm out the country, but sounds as though we'd have won with 13 men.

So that's three red cards for Watts this season, and two of them have been the wrong call. Seems he's definitely got a target on his back from the referees.

We certainly ran them impressively close with 12, can't say we would have won, but as has been said, it's done now. We've been ripped off by officials too often this season.

Call it a conspiracy if you like, but I believe Liam got off because if they charged him they couldn't have not charged SOL for his assault on Marc. They're bent and we all know it.

The whole system is ridiculous though, because how can it be Sending off sufficient .....sufficient for what, when there's no mention of foul play?

Richard Silverwood just agreed that they could have said "No charge on-field decision incorrect!" At least that would have been an attempt to gain some respect back!!

So they don't charge him they're wrong, and if they charge him they're wrong. Gee.

The only Wigan incident reported in the disciplinary summaries is the the Sean O’Loughlin late tackle on Sneyd in the 2nd minute.

I've been trying to get my head round that as well. It sounds like you can be sent off for accidental/unintentional contact with the head.

No, the RFL create situation where they are indefensible, and most RL fans are sick of it!

As I added just now to my above post

Richard Silverwood just agreed that they could have said "No charge on-field decision incorrect!" because by what they have said it was and at least that would have been an attempt to gain some respect back!!

... just looking again, the decision is "charge", and the outcome is "Sending off Sufficient".


Sounds like sending off is always a "charge".
Or, to put it another way, sending off has never ended up with "no charge, 'cos the ref got it wrong".