No, he wasn't. As I said a few pages back, he made a few mistakes (understandably), but also showed some encouraging signs as well. He might not be the answer to our long term halfback problem, but he's sure as hell done enough to be given a chance to show that he is the answer.

1. A chairman should absolutely nothing to do with team selection. Even if he doesn't agree with Radford, he should leave the coach to do the job he's been appointed for and then judge him on the results of his work/decisions.
2. What a player earns should have no bearing on whether or not they play.

Just because a coach makes a decision doesn't mean it is necessarily the right one, otherwise all coaches would agree about everything, and they clearly don't. Your argument is fundamentally flawed (seemingly because the coach in question is your mate (or you want him to be)).

For what its worth, I think he should of started the season at 7, the first 5 games where ideal for him, our pack been very good, and defence having plenty of enthusiasm. Think he was ok last season behind a beaten pack, and got let down by is team mates in defence, in to many games, Miller was often first into a tackle and not given the help. I think its clear to see we need scrum half to play scrum half, we've got one, so why not give him a chance

Complete and utter rubbish from what I've been told,

When pre-season training started Radders was getting involved in training and Radders being Radders told Miller to get past him which Miller did easily leaving Radders grasping for thin air everytime Radders tried to tackle him.

Miller wasn't brought here for his tackling he was brought here because he is a young halfback with talent, tackling technique can be taught and improved and given thats what Radders is known for you'd expect him to try and help improve Millers technique not hold a grudge because he was made to look a fool by Miller when he tried and failed to tackle Miller.

It makes me laugh how Radford is treating Miller considering it was him who wanted Miller to stay when Miller first found out that Gentle had been sacked and met with Miller and his agent on a number of occasions before he went back home to Australia to convince him to stay.

Ask any of the players they will tell exactly what happened and may even tell you exactly what I've been told that most of Them think Miller is being treated unfairly by Radford.

Agreed. He's a possible answer, and what we have seen the last few games clearly isn't, so there's nothing to lose by at least looking at him again.

Agree, but whats annoying is bringing back when our pack is going to be at its worst! Leaving him hung out to dry again! Seriously think Radders as got this one wrong

Sione Faumuina anyone (allegedly)?

I'm not sure on the first part, but the last part is certainly true. Most players are baffled as to why Pitts is being left out too. Maybe it's the same reason McDonnell is seeking legal advice?

I am not bothered who coaches them..I didn't want PG to go I thought he was treat unfair & didn't have enough time tbf...& I have said all along I want the team to compete & plat with a bit of respect for themselves the fans & our club..I don't want to see anyone at FC fail players or coaches.

Only repeating what I've been told by a number of the players after asking the reason why Miller isn't playing and that is the only explanation they can come up with.

Fair enough, no reason to not believe you given the evidence.

Feka wants to be careful then.. because he embarrassed radders a few seasons ago when he trampled him into the DW turf!

"evidence"

A faceless person behind a keyboard claims to be well in with the squad and thats "evidence"

But its not only Jacob Miller is it?
Crooks, Lineham (before injury) Shaul & presumably Miller
all look to have their confidence shot under Radford.