I just don't really see the point in that. If Biggs is fancied as a first choice winger, we won't really get better than Crookes as a reserve.

The more worrying possibility would be a centre going out to bring in another winger/fullback. With Pearson talking about Thompson as a centre that gives us 4 + youngsters, and with him also talking about Yeaman fairly positively last night they would both seem fairly safe. I wouldn't like to lose either of the other 2, personally.

Bomber and Gentles recruitment was w@nk!

Correct, and people are forgetting he didn't even get on the park until Round 14 of SL.

If we are at full cap with our present squad then it was truly awful. Agar got some abuse, but I would have to say his recruitment was better than those two.

Could take a while to sort out.

Yup, and that was after he slated the last regimes recruitment 'mediocrity'.
Think AP has learnt a few hard lessons and now knows things aren't that easy.

He's gotta address 6 and 7 for us to move forward.
He emphatically stated that he was going too.
Waiting.

He also said he wasn't fit for the whole season so with no England games could the player that was expected

CANT ARGUE WITH THAT.... Johnson and pitts for starters, then theres o'caroll and McKinnon to throw into the mixer
...and lets not forget about obst!!!!
how many of our recent signings have actually seen there contract out??? must be at least 4-5 who have been paid off early

McKinnon was Rich's signing.
Good larker just didn't fancy the job.

TBF Pitts is a decent player to have around. Plus O'Carroll, McKinnon & Obst were all signed before Gentle was appointed. Only O'Carroll was signed after Pearson bought the club.

so was o'carroll

Says in the wail that miller is one of our highest paid players - whoever agreed that contract wants signing. Also been told that pitts, crookes and arundell are on way more than they would have got elsewhere

yes, but wasn't bomber there in some capacity before gentle??