Figure!

Great post
Can you describe to me how Dr Allam is dangerous (maybe his rolls royce is dangerous when knocking down members of the general public)? To me I would be more threatened by Bambi.

In my opinion, the only person (people) coming out of this badly are the Allams. Essentially he is used to getting what he wants in life, but did not have the forsight to realise that people would not kowtow to his inane whining and gift him a public asset. HIs idiotic plans, and photos at Melton just made him appear more ludicrous. The fact is now, he owns a club with no assets and has alienated some (most) of the supporters. As well as annoying a respected CEO / management exec in Pearson. (you can read the national papers to see what they have to say). I am sure he realises now he probably has zero chance of making back his original investment, and despite the statements to the contrary, I think he wanted to make cash. Don't you?
One of the only people who seems to be in Allams bed, is some sort of despicable human in his own right, chasing ambulances and pushing up peoples outlays on insurance for his own ends. They will do well together.
I hope Allam does as great for Rovers as he has done for everything else. At least he may be able to "give something back to the people of Hull"

Have you some form of Tourettes?

You sound increasingly more hopeful than incredulous.

Other than there will probably be no new SMC agreement - which most of us were becoming resigned to anyway as time went on - would you care to elaborate on the section I have underlined?

The existing agreement holds. Hull will pay their bills and the the SMC will fulfill their obligations to Hull under the existing contract. End of. I doubt there's very little need for the two to cross paths at all. I certainly don't think Duffen spent many minutes if any with Rule and there was no love lost there, either. How will (and why would) the new situation pan out any different?

No need to think that way

Fair point. I just think there is the potential for conflict rather than cooperation on fixture scheduling....training on the pitch etc.

If Pearson thought there was room for negotiation on reducing the rental agreement, what's to say Allam doesn't have the mandate to invoke the opposite?

The potential for conflict would become more pertinent if an Allam-owned Hull City ever reached the Premiership, in view of Karen Brady's recent comments.

City have to play their matches and Hull theirs - that's the agreement, Allam can't dictate otherwise. The Football League and the RFL will set them. Hull take priority for scheduling any additional fixtures at the end of our season and City's needs come second, and vice versa. That's in the existing agreements. Neither team train on the pitch.


Both have to agree to negotiate on anything. Obviously. Allam can't make an arbitrary decision to change anything affecting Hull.


So many ifs and only one fact - City ain't making the Premiership under Allam, my love. He can't spend the cash. He can't have the KC. This is kind of what the last couple of days have been about, bless poor Nicky.....

But if by some miracle in the future they did - and by another miracle Brady's delusions became reality, then City would have to find themselves a new home. Or build us one.

Could the Council get rid of Allam as Chairman of the SMC ?
Maybe a new job for AP?
Lets face it the Council are no big fans of Allam.

Maybe a couple of rounds of "There's only one Adam Pearson" on Saturday night will show our owner what we think of him.

Will Pearson put himself on Hull FCs books now that he is out of work?