OK keep going even though he and the team obviously upset you, I apologize for not realising that some people really want to part with their hard earned cash to whinge and be miserable.

Same here. A special level of either stupidity or delusion.

I am not pointing the finger at any individual bud,just saying it gets a bit o.t.t. sometimes,but hey,people are big enough to look after themselves on here.
Maybe I should just

That Leeds crossed our line successfully once upto the 71st minute was testimant to Hulls very good defence. Or, in your world does it mean the opposition are poor if your team has good defence. Strange, some of the most exciting games I have seen have been low scoring affairs, one was ever scoreless. Were both teams poor on those occasions?

Judging on Huddersfield getting gupped at Odsal suggests not everyone of the top 6 would have beaten Leeds this weekend just gone.

Its probably worth you gaining some knowledge of the game to begin with. Start with a kids game, U11's perhaps, it will be easier for you to follow.

MMJ - Owned!

As i've said. Average fb. Strong left, weak right. 2 good prob's. 1 good 9. Never played 13 as a pivot. 2 average halves. What do you expect?

I played at School, being part of a Yorkshire Cup and National Cup winning side. I played Youth Club rugby upto U17's. Played open age for only one and a half season as I was seriously injured whilst playing. Subsequently I trained with a few amateur clubs to keep fit for around 7 year. I have been losely involved sports media on coverage of RL. I have watched the professional game for the last 30 years.

Given the conditions, I thought Leeds did ok. Note, I am not saying they were great, fantastic or even slick, just ok. They did the basics better then Hull. Yes, as Carl points out, they spilled the ball on several occasions, due to the wet conditions. Also, as Carl points out, Peacock did bomb two chances, he should have passed to Ablett. Instead he passed to Maguire, who subsequently knocked on. I lost count of the times the likes of Radford, Westerman, Lauaki etc knocked on within the opposition 20 yard line. To say they were poor suggests you either do not consider Hulls defencive effort in the first 70 mins as being good and you have not factored in the wet conditions.

OH, Seb. You still on your one man boycott? Or did you go against your promise of no longer attending whilst Agar was in charge. Either way you appear to have the backbone of a newt

Welcome, like thinker!

(For what it's worth, I believe ICECREAMMAN is a communal sign-on for a few different people within the club, the odd player, maybe some of the coaching and back-room staff. As BB has pointed out the writing style, grammar and (laughingly) opinions change daily. Somedays he's an Aussie, somedays appears to have a long history in this country. Either way, (t)he(y)'s fascinating.)

Thank ye for the welcome! Its all very entertaining reading for a novice poster ha ha!!

Its irrelevant who he is,he certainly gets peoples backs up tho