WHOOOOOOOOOSH

I was only making a suggestion instead of moaning like every other melon on here.

and I was only commenting on your suggestion. I presume that's why you posted it, so people could comment on it?

Oh ther irony.

The revolution is taking another step up the ladder

solidarity brothers

Precisely! Comment, not slate.

Ok,

Its a wonderful idea, I can see how getting 10,000 fans to contribute 350 quid each to buy out kaths minority shareholding, and then get said 10,000 fans to agree on a new board (or more precisely a replacement for Kath, who will have no power due to having a minority shareholding) will be achievable. I also think that there will be a unanimity among the 10,000 new shareholders about the way in which the club should be led, and we wont be back here in a month discussing ways in which to buy out the people that think the wrong person was employed. etc etc

Better?

Much bettericon_wink.gif A variety of positive and negative feedback, just what i needed Cheers!

Less would be covered up and kept in house with 10000 shareholders

You think so! The banks managed it for long enough!

We all trust banks! (except TSB )

you can't get the 50ish regular posters on here to agree on anything (besides Thorman's general crapness) How do you think multiplying that by a factor of 200 would work in any way, shape or form?

Really? Why?

Or were you under the impression that ordinary shareholders were told everything about the operation of a company...

agar has been in charge for a year now. The team are underperforming, playing abysmal rugby and seem to lack effort. A decent coach gets the best out of players, agar does not. Stop laying the blame elsewhere

No one could definitively say he would fail, however there was a high probability he would, and it's come home to roost. At the time, the club shouldn't have gambled on an untried coach