So basically a player getting sent off late in a game is not punishment?

He's not even been off the field the amount of time he'd get for a lesser offence that warranted a sin bin

It depends on what they charge him with if its the same as this

rlhttp://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary_item.php?id

Given its a year since he got two match suspension for almost the same thing, I would expect he could even get three or more.

Didnt Jake Webster get sent off in the last 5 mins or so at Bradford was found guilty and got sending off sufficient?????

Tansey's previous is likely to be his biggest problem.

So your actually claiming he attempted to seriously injure the player? Then have the nerve to claim someone is embarrasing themselves through bias? Brilliant.

Either way he was found guilty!

I agree there will be more emphasis on a player missing a large chunk of a game going towards a ban but I think with the Webster case they have shown previous at the disciplinary commitee - technically Websters punishment was less then a sin binning for a 'guilty' charge.

That said Tansey's record will be his biggest downfall but he could easily have cost his team the game last night which I beleive may be taken into consideration.

Yes, i'd imagine picking someone up and dropping them on their head is an attempt to injure someone.

Maybe but then again SOS is the easy way out for the disciplinary rather than find a player not guilty which would then mean they admit the ref got it wrong.

And with Brian Mcdermott having a say about this when Sykes got banned for a similar incident not long ago I think that will work against you.

So he couldn't have been attempting to tackle the player and just got it wrong? Maybe you were dropped on your head as a baby? I'm sure your mummy didn't mean it though.

You are now assuming something which is incorrect. Morgan himself said Webster had made more tackles then usual in this particular game and was probably 'tired' when he wrapped his considerable arm around the Bulls players head.

The report clearly states that he made an illegal challenge.

To suggest Tansey deliberately intended to injure the Crusaders player in a premeditated illegal challenge is just wrong. Maybe the colour of his jersey is clouding your judgement?

Quite true,but as Tansey ran at the player and upended him,I would argue it was not a deliberate spear tackle.

Thats ok then, He won't get banned then much like you don't for an accidental high tackle.