3 of our 5 quota players are hardly "names"

If we had a team of superstars in each position we'd be even more threatening.

You can always improve a squad, but you have to prioritise. Centre simply isn't that weak an area compared to Half Back and Pack, especially as we have young English players who can play there for many seasons to come. There's plenty of threat in our centres provided we get them quality ball - and to do that we need a good pack and half backs that can create.

If Long would have been fit sunday, 95% of posts on this board since would not have happened

3 of 6 or 4 of 6

We have an International centre and two International wingers. We have a full back who's played in the NRL.

Not sure how much more experience and/or quality we need at this point in the squad's development TBH.

but he isnt and without him we'll be shafted on most occasions and whats knarks me off is that this situation couldve been avoided if the club had any foesight

roll on the next forum, plan b plan b plan b plan b

then again the coach will be gone by then

tbf Moa is only here because Willie shoved him in his suitcase and brought him over because he was his mate

We have one creative half back. You saw on Sunday what happens when he's injured. If we lose a centre we have ample cover of good quality.

Moa will be a good signing and could be a good signing for years to come. It would have been better for squad balance to sign a backup half back, but in the absence of one (whether through not looking properly or unavailability) then he was certainly a better option than another centre. Assuming that he gets used correctly, of course.

the pressure's on already

think we'll skip round plan b, anyone got advance on plan c?

come on wolfie, i know your reading it