good old bruce aka des aka f90 he does make us laugh bet his mam got her washing line full of his soggy socks lol

I think you'll find all clubs have, sunshine. hkr 0 barrow 1 is a fairly memorable one that springs to mind.

I haven't seen the rest of yesterday's results, but I'm assuming that you resurfacing on this forum, after being absent in recent weeks , means hkr have finally opened their account for 2014.

Don't see why not. If we've lost them all thats a pretty big indicator as to how things are going.

I think we'll be ok though and believe Radford will be given time.

reading radford comments he is saying what the fans are thinking, now he has to act on them, still prepared to give him time,

Don't forget 50-0 saints in the cup semi or saints at magic 50 odd - 0 or Huddersfield at home 0-30 in SL.

What a Dickhe*d Bruce is. Some Rovers fans on here have posted some good stuff just lately then this tossa rears his ugly head again.

Can people please not quote Bruce Forsyth. I have him on my foes list for a reason

Nothing to fill his days with until Strictly comes back

Looking at the stats, 22 errors by Hull Compared to Widnes 11. Only 1 clean break for Hull.

Crooks stats are appalling, he nearly made negative meters and nearly as many errors as he made tackles.

Confidence seems shot through or is he the new Craig Hall? He can do it all and at times last year looked as good a prospect as we've seen for years but the same could have been said about Hall. If it is confidence then Radders needs to find the key to get him back up asap and that isn't sitting him on the bench for half a game to think about it. He has to play and , for me , in place of Yeaman who regardless of stats should have gone last year. Arundel's not setting the world on fire but with a few games may improve. These guys are either the future or not good enough but they've got to have a run of games to find out. Same goes for Miller. Look at Bowden , he wouldn't have got game time if it hadn't been for injuries.

The reason why hadley never got used..he was meant to be out on when we was comfortable in the game to gain minutes..the reason crooks was sub was to be given time to gain a bit of confidence also when we was on top of the game..but not going to plan & bombing what scoring opportunitys we had was no place for players like basket finding there feet.poor kid was sat thinking he had done wrong & had been forgot about!

If that is true then that was an appalling team selection by Radders. It smells of complacency to me that he thought we would easily win the match. The players attitudes have often been questioned by the fans for not showing up in games that we're "supposed to win" but that's hardly going to change if Radders has the same attitude. We need to learn that we don't have the right to win any game and must earn that right on the pitch over the 80 minutes.

Beat me to it. If there's any truth in that at all then there's no wonder our attitude stinks in the so-called 'expected to win' games. 2 subs included to gain confidence once the game was already won? I really hope that's just a load of rhubarb from easthull fc fan rather than a true reflection of an immensely arrogant and complacent approach.

Radford shared all that with you did he?

Why is it stinky attitude? It's just faith in the selected team chosen...& yes when your team is in front & on a roll its easier to vet youngsters/squad players for them to gain confidence..then it is to be chasing the game getting slung on & upto speed with the game..can make it worse

Yeah why? Why do people find it hard to believe some of FC staff have mates away from the KC? Also why would I lie? Meet you at the game Fri and show you eh? Not that I have to prove anything to anyone..maybe some people wish they was in the loop?