For me if JB is good enough then he is old enough. I would rather have JB in at FB than move a player who has rarely/never played the FB role.

We will never see our younger players grow and progress if we dont show faith in them and let them have a crack at SL at the earliest opportunity. Would Horne or Cooke have got this far if they hadnt been given the chance at such young ages??

It is always a fine line when bringing players through but handled correctly it shouldnt pose a problem for his progression.

The one thing I would say is I don't know if JB is good enough or mentally ready for SL and neither do most of the fans on here but the coaching staff do so I trust them to make the right call.

Hall - can't catch , no confidence , gone anyway
Jack B - Inexperienced
Turner - Suspect under high balls and one on one tackling in the open not brilliant
So what about Washy? No flare or creativity at SO but generally solid and dependable. Turner to SO , it's what he thinks he is, Tom to centre , it's what I think he is, and Jack on the wing ...or Hall. Not a good solution but then none of the options are. Just a thought.

Lets not forget Tansey isn't exactly great in that position also.

Hame for f/back





it is the way forward!

That is regrettably very true and something perhaps we have been overlooking!!

I agree with that...I am undecided about Tansey overall tbh, his biggest area of development for me it to learn he is part of a TEAM, he is a very individual player yet does not have the consistent top draw attributes needed to make an individual play making decision.

glad craig hall is getting a chance to end his spell at hull 2night

agar using comon sence over stupidity

IT WOULD BE LIKE WATCHING PAUL WOODS AGAIN