Liam Watts...said he will have to drop/rest him, I do not think he should have said it on Sky, maybe he should have to told the player first?

Yes.

Although our Cup game performance needs to be huge, and comes on the back of the derby, Wire, Leeds in close succession. CC is our only chance of silverware IMO and we should put plenty of eggs in this basket. Up to the coach to select, rotate and gameplan appropriately to give us our best shot at it.

No, especially with young developing players, with inexperience it should be expected they will have the odd mare, and to be honest a few of the senior players like Briscoe had mare's however they were not singled out and publicly dropped. As good as Morgan is he is still a gobs*te when he is stood in front of a camera.

I didn't see it, I take it he used the word dropped in relation to Liam Watts?

He said he needs to rest him, which as the kid is not injured means dropped.

Not really, Wheeldon was rested against Saints, Netherton last night so it's Liams turn this week. Looks like he will make it a consistant rotation of these 3

No issues with resting/dropping players...however to use a young players on National tv as one of the excuses then name the player to be rested is harsh...he should have spoken to the young lad first IMO.

Foe what its worth I am led to believe that as was noted on here a while ago, he knows he has a performance revue with the directors around Easter , but thus far its a bit confusing with wins against Sts, Hudds and Cas then a loss to Crusaders but no shame in a loss at Wigan to be fair, however the manner of the defeat was hard to take....
Agar has said "the lads know where they went wrong" I would like to know what they discussed!!

Would be a hell of a lot more if you didn't pick up very lucky wins against cas and saints

Who cares what they did at bradford? Last night he came up with a gameplan, his players executed it to perfection and his team destroyed ours. They could easily have had 60 points last night.

And we could have easily threw the towel in, but didn't.

Although the defeat was dissapointing, the three late tries give us something to build on for next week and show that we are not just going to curl up and die like we have done on numerous occasions over the past 2 years.

If they could easily have had 60 points but didn't, doesn't that constitute a failure of the plan?

Couple of dropped balls, couple of decisions against them. Maybe they just got bored running in tries?