We are an A grade, in 7th

Seems performances (surprise surprise) not owning the ground and empty seats holding us back. Scoring well on turnover, TV audiences, social media and all that jazz.

Done really well to get an A,with on field performances taken in to account

Quite surprised in a good way.

London sat in 24th whilst Toulouse are 10th, that play off final must've killed IMG/RFL

Seems a bit harsh to be effectivity marked down for playing in the best stadium in the league but generally we have to be happy with an A.

Is there any point in London bothering next season? They could win every game and still be relegated.

Appleyard's headline is Rovers ahead of FC. Very true but would have thought securing a grade A is of more importance than one-upmanship. Not entirely surprising though.

It's.oossibly to discourage teams desperately renting big grounds to tick the box, like Cas could say hire Elland Road at.big expense but what does that really achieve?

Quite obvious we need to sort ourselves out on the field then crowds will be boosted a bit.

Surprised but satisfied with A but as you say that particular criteria is flawed.

We have 4th highest average attendance despite our p*ss poor performances. It's baffling that we are penalised for having the biggest and best stadium in SL.

It's just another imaginary trophy to put in their cabinet

Even if we achieve the highest average attendance in SL say 15k because our stadium is too big we will still be marked down. Strange.

Guy is a joke, unfortunately for him his biased and poor journalism skills will come back to haunt him, will struggle to progress in this area and could be stuck at the HDM for either.

Think Cas' constant promise of jam tomorrow on the new stadium has finally come back to bite them. With Wakeys ground improving and Leighs grade likely to also get higher with another season in SL, not sure what they can do to stay up in the top flight in 2025. Wonder what London actually do as well, down in 24th place, next season is quite pointless for them, it'll make recruitment difficult too as players will only be signing for 1 year in SL.

Thought we would be a decent B team, but to get an A with how bad our onfield performances have been over the last few years is an outstanding effort by management and everybody who works behind the scenes at the club.

This, and when you consider the work done in reserves and academy which aren't substantively recognised, even more so.

We’ve got an A with the potential to improve even further. Not sure many other A clubs have that ability.

That said, I don’t agree with the criteria anyway. We get huge crowds in super league terms and we’re penalised due to having a bigger stadium. No credit is given for fielding academy and reserve teams. Just count the clicks instead.

Still think IMG is smoke and mirrors. Rearranging deckchairs on the titanic.