NFA-1, but has EGP. Not sure if he has right to appeal if NFA

He'll get 1 game probably, reduced to nothing by burning his early guilty plea

There's been nothing front he club saying he's taken the EGP, and the info on the RFL website doesn't say he's accepted one as yet.

The hearing isn't until tonight, so it's a bit of a guessing game at the moment.

Says in the wail he'll take the egp

i think you have until 11am to take the EGP

Have people seen the tackle? I honestly can't see how it's dangerous contact. Sarginsons leg gets caught under Watts but nothing Watts could help to prevent that and wouldn't call it dangerous contact at all, in fact Sarginson jumps up to play the ball without any problem. I'd appeal it, the sports becoming a joke!

It wasn't even the worse tackle in the game although I'd like him to miss the Derby id appeal it

Only seen it the once, but he seemed to do everything right. Hits above the waist and slides down the legs. He's not third man in, possibly second. If anything it's the two players coming in that complete the tackle that cause the problem. Watts can't do much about it.

He said he doesn't know what he'd done wrong and he might find out when he goes tonight.

he`s submitted his EGP and is available for Sunday

shouldn't have had to submit an epg as there was nothing to plead guilty for, but knowing the rfl he'd probably get 1 game, radders probably didnt want to take the chance after last weeks joke decision with frank

They'll probably cite him again on Sunday for looking at somebody the wrong way. Or some other BS reason :/

Wrong call by the club IMO, waste of an EGP. We should of fought it. Worse case scenario he somehow loses it and is out for 1 game against a bottom 4 team.I think it sets a dangerous precedent if tackles like that are getting punished,

Be intersting to see who cited it. Or will that remain one of Red Hall's mysteries?

Always makes me laugh that Danny Sculthorpe and Stuart Fielden are both on the disciplinary panel

Apparently, and this is only according to the Twitter, if we hadn't played the early guilty plea, contested it and won he still loses the early guilty plea for next time. It's not like a tennis review where you keep it if you're right, you get to use it the first time you're cited and that's it.

Makes a ridiculous system even more ridiculous if that's true. Still absolutely mystified as to what is wrong with the tackle.

He did much worse to Burrow the other week and nothing was done. SOL's frustrated smacked into Taylor's face on Friday not cited either. Seems to be setting a precedent that you can whack people straight in the face and it's not a problem, but tackle people (correctly) round the legs and you expect somebody to pore over every detail of it in slow mo.