No charge for high tackle and charged but with only a warning for spear tackle.

First one wasn't even a pen, Alibert was happy with it, it was the video ref who called it foul. Second one was just clumsy, would have been shocked if he'd been banned for that, Manu's was worse and wasn't penalised.

What was wrong with Manu's?

He was playing in black & white

Manu's tackle? Why?

too right lol

Spot on about Yeaman, nothing wrong with Manu's, Gilmour just landed awkward.

You are joking right??

Why would he have been penalised for that? quality tackle,nothing wrong with it unless im missing something here?

the one on Cudjoe wasnt that bad either, if you watch he actually lands on his hand/arm

The Grix tackle penalty was shocking shouts from both ref and vid ref, and Kirk let Halibut know it too didnt he

So the tackle on grix was deemed fine by the rfl and by both coaches ,but will Mr alibert or Mr Bentham be reprimanded for the mistake ?

giraffe time Red hall has deeper pockets than FIFA mate

To be fair to Alibert he had no problem with the tackle until told by the VR that it was high. At that point he was pretty much obliged to give the penalty.

No idea why Bentham thought he had to step in. My guess would be because Grix had been injured.

That is something I find disconcerting and serves to simply undermine the authority of the ref on the field. I could understand it if Bentham considered Yeaman's tackle was worthy of an instant dismissal but for him to exert influence in that way was simply pi[is[/ispotical

Had to laugh when i watched it back last night

"Eeet was a leetle beet high"