For me Moa in for Cusack he would have added extra last night more power in both attack and defence, and then calderwood in for Hall apart from this all the same

Nobody did anything wrong last night, keep it the same.

Nail on the head

If it ain't broke, don't fix it

Agree, barring any injuries leave alone

agree

upto players to lose there places

same again

Agar did say at the forum that he was going to use the rotation on the forwards unless injuries played their hand , I suppose when we now have class in depth the boys with niggles dont have to play through them anymore which is nice

cussack was a tower of strength last night ha d a great game!!
very powerful in defence over and over

Same again, I think Agar originally went for Yak because we needed fitness on the field we had more than enough manpower, unfortunatley Moa lacks that slightly.

Thoughts on this one though guys: If Calderwoods fit... would you put him in?? My thoughts are a no.

I'd keep things the same unless anyone is no longer fully fit then rotate. Huddersfields pack will be down to two specialist props with no Mason so no need to change really.

As I said on the other thread, I'd put Calderwood back in as he's a specialist winger, which Hall is not. I'd like to see Moa in, but that's just my personal preference of liking to see two 'impact' props out of the four. I can well see the reasons for sticking with the same pack as last night.

I agree what some have out about Calderwood as he is a specialist winger and probably should be back in the team.

I agree about keeping the same, but 'if' we were to tinker.

If Calder's is fit, and if Berro can do the 80, I would bring Calderwood in with Hall @ . I would put Whiting on the bench in place of Houghton. I would also toy with the idea of dropping Tickle, move Fitzy to second row, and bring Washy in at loose.

I'm glad you said 'if'. That would be rather harsh on Whiting, Tickle and Houghton.

Dont change anything, as Hutchie said, people's places are their to lose now.