Wonder who the ex pro was who decided we had no player in contention for man of match.All four players from Leeds,seems strange.

Just Leeds getting preferential treatment again like they always do in every aspect of our game...

Hetherington

The new way of choosing is ridiculous. Go back to the way it was

Sinfield.

Last home gave v Warrington

F.C. beat wolves but the sky man of the match went to Warrington Clarke

We said that, but then realised that the majority of Wire fans were at home and able to vote whereas home fans are at the ground. Whilst we have the ability to vote still, I certainly don't think about it while at a game so I think we'll see this quite a lot with the new way of doing it.

Is not necessarily wrong that a player from a losing side can win MOM, especially in a fairly close game which that against Wire was so I'm not too fussed about that one. However to suggest that the top 4 candidates in a close game all come from one side is starting to stretch the bounds of credibility. If the mystery "former Super League star" who picked the 4 was named instead I'm fairly confident this wouldn't have happened, would it Mr Sinfield?

At least someone like Phil Clarke will openly put their name to contentious statements and declarations and not hide their identity.

To suggest a MoM can be decided at 60 minutes is ludicrous in the first place. Good Friday 2016 shows exactly what can happen in the final 20 minutes of a game.

Clarke wasn't even Wire's best player that match either IMO (Ratchford was)

Agree, when they went down to 12 Ratchford sparked their rival.

The best way to decide the M.o.M is to ask someone out of the crowd who clearly knows nothing about the game to give his or her verdict. How about the match sponsor?

It's another little change that Sky have made that is so amateurish,at least tell us who the panel consists of.With the Warrington M.O.M. i would think it would be someone with past affiliations to the Warrington camp.They can't think up daft gimmicks quick enough They want to watch Vossy and co on the NRL, you get a good match report and no constant rewinds to past incidents,and no daft gimmicks.

Seems daft but the thing I like most about the coverage of our game with St George was when there was a replay to be shown it was played in the bottom corner of the screen while still showing the game being played. Sky could learn a lot from the NRL coverage, only daft little things like that but they make it a lot better to watch.

I was at a match when a Hull player left the field injured with a bit less than 20 mins to play and didn't return. Hull were beaten by over 30 points in their worst ever defeat at that venue yet he still won the MOM in a canter.