Looking at this, https://twitter.com/wtwchairman/status/ ... 4651462656, I'd have to say I don't think we will be seeing Ellis against Catalan next week, and indeed, maybe for a couple after that as well. Thoughts?

Looking at this, https://twitter.com/wtwchairman/status/ ... 4651462656, I'd have to say I don't think we will be seeing Ellis against Catalan next week, and indeed, maybe for a couple after that as well. Thoughts?

Doesn't look great but then it doesn't look any worse than the one Talanoa took against Leeds and that resulted in no action.
However who knows what the panel will decide!

Deserves a ban, EGP one match IMO.

Only thing to defend Ellis is, if you look at were the tackle starts, to were Tupou head ends up - Ellis would have very likely hit his upper body had Tupou head not gone down.

Interesting to see it's the Wakefield chairman that's posted it.

The player does drop his head a bit as Ellis comes in. If he hadn't then there would not have been the same contact.

Probably should have been a red today, so I think he will do well to only get 1, probably 2 imo. Depends on grade I suppose.

Never ever a red, clumsy no intent and as others have shown, Simon's head went down

2 games, we'd have been calling for the same.

That was one on Simon, Tupou had to have 15 stitches and suspected broken jaw.

Head clash according to Radford, if it was that bad, your professional chairman would have been all over Twitter about it.

Are you for real? That's never a red card in a million years.

Not me. But then I can tell the difference between a deliberate high shot and accidental contact.

Maybe, maybe not. You make contact with the head in that way, especially considering the injuries, malicious or not, accidental or not, your risking a sending off.

We can debate until the cows come in, but I suspect the disciplinary panel will be having a say on it.

What's with all these chairmen whinging on social media lately? It's embarrassing.

dipped his head into the tackle, nowt wrong with it,