If they pay rent its good for the Hull taxpayer. I would probably go if it was at the KC, no chance of me going to Caravan Park.

Some Hull fans say the don't want to go to the poor facilities at craven park, so everyone would be happy.

More people attending games is only a good thing.

they should be getting some strongly worded cautions from the RFL about failing in their comittments in their franchise bid.

Makes sense all round and does no harm.

Probably work out cheaper for FC fans anyway

Indeed, but if Mr H puts his hand in his pocket and pays the going rate, no problem as far as I'm concerned

why would it be an issue, surely using the citys stadium to its best potential is only a good thing??? see nothing but good however its all fantasy from the DC comic book of rlfans

Crikey Didn't know they had started building Allam's own Stadium for City let alone finished it..

Good solution as far as I am concerned, 20000 + rugby fans from the city of Hull enjoying a Good Friday true derby, every-ones a winner (well apart from the losing team that is )

The only REAL problem is where do you put the 'home' fans.
As an East stand fan I will be beating the boards door down if they try and stick me behind a deadball line.

Plus how many FC fans are going to get shirty that 'their' seat has a Red and White sat in it for a derby.

Where did I suggest that? You read my post and allude that I'd suggested Hull City own the KC, Then jump down my throat with a cheap attempt at point scoring. Weak, The OP was closer to suggesting that Hull FC own the KC by naming it "our home".

Simple. If it's Fc home game you get your seat. If its deemed a rovers home game they get the seat. Friendly's are alternated. Cup games work on home draw get the home benefits.

I agree with you but will others see it the same?
FC Vs KR is rather emotive and some will see it as us getting one over you no matter how misguided that is.