After Nigel Woods salary was made public on Monday there have been a lot of anger and frustration shown by fans on social media and now a petition has been started with a VOTE OF NO CONFIDENCE in Mr Wood. I have posted the link below . https://www.change.org/p/rfl-nigel-wood ... confidence

After Nigel Woods salary was made public on Monday there have been a lot of anger and frustration shown by fans on social media and now a petition has been started with a VOTE OF NO CONFIDENCE in Mr Wood. I have posted the link below . https://www.change.org/p/rfl-nigel-wood ... confidence

If someone wants to pay him that much then that's their problem. Bugs me when people bang on about peoples high salaries and make it out that it is that persons fault. It is not Nigel woods fault that he gets paid so much, he isn't gonna turn it down because of some hypothetical moral standpoint and no one else would turn it down either. It has got literally nothing to do with any one of us.

Completely agree.

Even those who have a genine desire for change get it [ibadly[/i wrong at times.

As I posted earlier in the season, the review of the salaries at the RFL were done by an external company, when it came down to it the RFL executive paid themselves over the recommended increases anyway, ignoring what they were advised so in actual fact they wasted even more money by paying for an organisation to go through all the rigmorole, unless of course this company had some attachment to one or more of the execs, then that would make absolute sense.
I'll be signing it for one.

I thought we had learned our lessons on here about how useful petitions are already.

Judge him on what the RFL achieve, not what he's paid. None of us have any real idea what the internal workings or objectives of the RFL are. IMO there should be more visibility but there isn't so no one can say if he's goof value for what he earns.

The issue with pay is surely whether the recipient is being paid their worth. Whether getting cities or towns from other countries is advancing the game, therefore worth the money, whilst other local clubs go under is a moot point. There again is his salary paid by result or because of the status of the position. Inequality is inequality; higher pay for some is not equality.

Quote: Jake the Peg "Judge him on what the RFL achieve, not what he's paid. None of us have any real idea what the internal workings or objectives of the RFL are. IMO there should be more visibility but there isn't so no one can say if he's goof value for what he earns.'" media.therfl.co.uk/docs/RFL-Rugb ... 4-2021.pdf www.rugby-league.com/the_rfl/abo ... er_charter that first document is pretty comprehensive in laying out the strategic objectives of the RFL

Quote: Jake the Peg "Judge him on what the RFL achieve, not what he's paid. None of us have any real idea what the internal workings or objectives of the RFL are. IMO there should be more visibility but there isn't so no one can say if he's goof value for what he earns.'" media.therfl.co.uk/docs/RFL-Rugb ... 4-2021.pdf www.rugby-league.com/the_rfl/abo ... er_charter that first document is pretty comprehensive in laying out the strategic objectives of the RFL

Maybe we should have a petition about petitions.

He'll be crying to the mods now you've done that

Tbf, putting the ill conceived idea of leading with his salary (which is vulgar and not our business), the stats listed in the petition don't make for good reading

Honest question, has his tenure being a success?

I for one would have to say, no.