With escalating cases locally, the performance last night, the World Cup fiasco, the state of the RFL and the declining interest there seems to be in the game, these are indeed tough times and we all need a laugh now and again. Still I guess the one consolation is that you can always find someone who is worse off than yourself can't you? https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news/hu ... ng-5688353

With escalating cases locally, the performance last night, the World Cup fiasco, the state of the RFL and the declining interest there seems to be in the game, these are indeed tough times and we all need a laugh now and again. Still I guess the one consolation is that you can always find someone who is worse off than yourself can't you? https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news/hu ... ng-5688353

I've got a spare bike in the garage, He can have it for £50. Stabalises need mending though.

Then walk like an Egyptian

Or perhaps he could sell a couple of his local businesses (City and the SMC?) to someone who cares.

That would release funds for his two chauffeurs and also release pressure on some of his daily commutes.

Obviously he’d have to ask for his Dad’s permission first!

Be careful what you say, he might put your rent up...

He’ll be too busy thumbing lifts

what a shame the judge wasnt an fc supporter, he might have got a year ban

91 in a 70 limit ? That's the equivalent of 51 in a 30 zone or 41 in a 20 should have been a year ban at least

30 mph above any set limit is an automatic ban. This government we’re talking about raising the limit on motorways to 80mph. Don’t know how you’d be able to do it with all the idiots hogging lanes.

your equivalence isn't correct, it's not absolute speed differential to the limit, it's a %+small additional speed amount when looked at from a prosecution POV. 91 is 30% over, 51 in a 30 is 69% over and 41 in a 20 is a smidge over 100% over the limit.

Say for instance you're doing 79 on the A63, you'd be extremely unlikely to get prosecuted for that under the 10%+2mph rule (+3mph for the Met/TfL) If you're doing 39 in a 30 you absolutely would and 29 in a 20 also.

So If it was a singular incident of speeding, 91 in a 70 would be an NIP/3 points/SP30, 51 in a 30 and 41 in a 20 is more likely to get you a court appearance rather than an NIP, they aren't equivalent in % terms nor the potential harm to vulnerable road users.

That he's a habitual speeder and likely got away with speeding thousands of times (ike most motorists) should see repeated and ever increasing bans for next time he gets caught. The BS he came out with was risable.

Ffs.

STATO

Remember when threads were getting locked because they had nothing to do with Hull FC? What happened to that?