And seems we have won our minor battle over the TV screens farce: "Elsewhere, LED screens have also seen an amendment, allowing some points for those clubs whose screens have a greater pixel pitch than the IMG guidelines state"
Some minor tweaks to the IMG score system, most notably for insolvent clubs (cough) Salford (cough)
And seems we have won our minor battle over the TV screens farce: "Elsewhere, LED screens have also seen an amendment, allowing some points for those clubs whose screens have a greater pixel pitch than the IMG guidelines state"
Quote: "Points will be scored on the amount of times a club is on TV, with the six clubs that achieve the highest average match audience receiving one point.'"
Totally out a club's hands how many are watching on TV.
Quote: ComeOnYouUll "This bit is still a load of cack
Totally out a club's hands how many are watching on TV.'"
And what time slots the games are shown is a big factor. There are simply more TV viewers on a Thurs and Fri night compared to Saturday afternoon when there's often a full football schedule, people are out if the weather is nice etc.
Quote: ComeOnYouUll "This bit is still a load of cack
Quote: ComeOnYouUll "Points will be scored on the amount of times a club is on TV, with the six clubs that achieve the highest average match audience receiving one point.'"
Totally out a club's hands how many are watching on TV.'"
Exactly, it’s just another example of a poorly implemented system where some clubs no matter what they do are at a disadvantage in the grading. How can you have a system that awards grading points that is out of the hands of clubs in which some clubs will gain and others will lose in nothing more than a lottery.
lol viewing figures. How on earth can viewing figures actually be measured accurately?
No one knows if I’ve watched a game or not. Even more so with the advent of IPtV etc. Once upon a time to work out viewing figures a teeny tiny percentage of people of households had a set top box which monitored which channel you were watching to work out “ viewing figures”. These were totally optional if you were asked. Honestly interested if anyone knows where these figures quoted come from.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
