Quote:
Riderofthepalehorse "Quote: Riderofthepalehorse "Probably not developed as much as I thought he would do, but still improved alit last two years, strong runner, but has issues in defence main issues are the amount of long term injuries he seems to get, just about every year since he joined apart from last year.
Think the club have done right in not matching the Wakey offer, as he is a player we don't get value for money from.
Still think he could be a very good SL player if he can stay injury free'"
Do you know what Wakey offered him, according to Cam it’s speculation.
Hardaker and Chamberlain will not offer the same value for money, we will agree to differ on this one, here’s a lad who can play second row now, without waiting till he’s lost his pace,'"
How much was he offered by Wakey, did we even offer him a deal, did he decide he needed a change? I doubt any of us really know.
Its a mixed bag for me with Scott on the one had whilst he's not developed as much as many thought he's still improved year on year and isn't a bad option. Then on the other had he just never gets through a season without picking up a long term injury, admittedly some could be down to poor conditioning set up but ultimately he is another that just misses far too many games. We are losing a player that has grown with the club but does he offer any real value sat for half a season in the treatment room each year?
If we are to get back to being a side that challenges these are the decisions that should and have to be made with sentiment put aside.
As for Hardaker & Chamberlain not offering the same value as Scott, again we don't know as we don't know the deals made or offered etc, but Cam Scott won't have been playing for free and it seems we have been over paying a number of the squad.
Good luck to Cam in his future, sorry to see him bow out in the way he has.