|
FORUMS > Hull FC > Saints in the cup |
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 11574 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2024 | Jul 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
16831.gif :16831.gif |
|
|
Quote: Magic Superbeetle "I’ve held my tongue in this thread as fans are entitled to their opinion; but what you have written is beyond the pale.
Let’s start with the Fash incident. It’s a red card every day of the week. Direct contact with the head with the shoulder whilst prone in a tackle. I don’t think it was a particularly dirty play, but Fash went for an aggressive, dominant tackle and got it completely wrong, leaving a player stone cold K.O.’d. I truly don’t understand how Kendall got to on report; because either he’s penalising contact with the head and it’s a red card, or it’s a knock on, there’s really no inbetween. Those calling “oh the ref shouldn’t have sent Griffin off for the sake of the game”; that good grace was used for that tackle.
After we took the 2; you knocked the ball out on the third tackle which Kendall ignored and you took the ascendancy.
Then you have your second try which Kendall sent up as a try; when McIntosh knocked the ball forwards into Mata’utias forearm and it then went backwards to Savelio, which was ignored/ not overruled due to the silly guess work rules refs need.
And then you get to the insanity that was the Griffin incident. Kendall told him to walk away, he kept gobbing off so he sin binned him. He [istill[/i kept gobbing off, and gave Kendall no choice. There is a massive difference between challenging decisions and calling the ref a joke (an abbreviated version of what turned a yellow to a red I believe). If a saints player had done it I would have had no issue with the ref standing a player down like that; it’s a slippery slope in letting comments like that go and it turning into football.
And as a final point on “Saints got penalties close to our line; we only got penalties coming out of our own half”; I could debate the pros and cons of each to be honest, but I think the BBC put stats up half way through the second half that showed Saints had had 4 times more play the balls in Hulls half than vv. You tend to win penalties where you have the ball and Hull had the ball in their own half a lot and Saints had the ball in Hulls half a lot.
I get all fans see biases and inconsistency with refs; the Saints fans have a particular conspiracy with the disciplinary but generally I think that gives far too much credence to the RFL. I totally accept my counter points are a very Saints centric view of things as well, and that the reality is somewhere between the two of us. There were mistakes in Kendall’s game (yep, Batchelor did shoulder charge Fash, should have been a penalty) but they cut both ways, and in the big moments did well enough. Kendall didn’t lose you the game; Griffin did.'"
Maybe you should have held your tongue a bit longer!
seems the panel found no wrong in the Fash incident, like most knew!
https://www.rugby-league.com/article/61 ... view-panel
https://www.rugby-league.com/article/61 ... view-panel
|
|
Quote: Magic Superbeetle "I’ve held my tongue in this thread as fans are entitled to their opinion; but what you have written is beyond the pale.
Let’s start with the Fash incident. It’s a red card every day of the week. Direct contact with the head with the shoulder whilst prone in a tackle. I don’t think it was a particularly dirty play, but Fash went for an aggressive, dominant tackle and got it completely wrong, leaving a player stone cold K.O.’d. I truly don’t understand how Kendall got to on report; because either he’s penalising contact with the head and it’s a red card, or it’s a knock on, there’s really no inbetween. Those calling “oh the ref shouldn’t have sent Griffin off for the sake of the game”; that good grace was used for that tackle.
After we took the 2; you knocked the ball out on the third tackle which Kendall ignored and you took the ascendancy.
Then you have your second try which Kendall sent up as a try; when McIntosh knocked the ball forwards into Mata’utias forearm and it then went backwards to Savelio, which was ignored/ not overruled due to the silly guess work rules refs need.
And then you get to the insanity that was the Griffin incident. Kendall told him to walk away, he kept gobbing off so he sin binned him. He [istill[/i kept gobbing off, and gave Kendall no choice. There is a massive difference between challenging decisions and calling the ref a joke (an abbreviated version of what turned a yellow to a red I believe). If a saints player had done it I would have had no issue with the ref standing a player down like that; it’s a slippery slope in letting comments like that go and it turning into football.
And as a final point on “Saints got penalties close to our line; we only got penalties coming out of our own half”; I could debate the pros and cons of each to be honest, but I think the BBC put stats up half way through the second half that showed Saints had had 4 times more play the balls in Hulls half than vv. You tend to win penalties where you have the ball and Hull had the ball in their own half a lot and Saints had the ball in Hulls half a lot.
I get all fans see biases and inconsistency with refs; the Saints fans have a particular conspiracy with the disciplinary but generally I think that gives far too much credence to the RFL. I totally accept my counter points are a very Saints centric view of things as well, and that the reality is somewhere between the two of us. There were mistakes in Kendall’s game (yep, Batchelor did shoulder charge Fash, should have been a penalty) but they cut both ways, and in the big moments did well enough. Kendall didn’t lose you the game; Griffin did.'"
Maybe you should have held your tongue a bit longer!
seems the panel found no wrong in the Fash incident, like most knew!
https://www.rugby-league.com/article/61 ... view-panel
https://www.rugby-league.com/article/61 ... view-panel
|
|
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 8429 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2006 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2024 | Jul 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: Dave K. "Grade F is laughable, unless he said something racist orvalong them lines, it's really excessive, the fact he will get more than someone who headbutted someone twice or a two spear tackles that could have broke a players neck so what a joke the disciplinary is.'"
Be interesting to see the transcript. I am sure the club have requested the audio from the referee mic
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Academy Player | 741 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2022 | 2 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2024 | Jul 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Common sense regarding Fash's tackle, no mention of Batchelors clear shoulder charge...
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Academy Player | 712 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2022 | 2 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2024 | Jun 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: HU8HFC "Common sense regarding Fash's tackle, no mention of Batchelors clear shoulder charge...'"
And how about Walmsleys knees on Trueman?
| | | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 7997 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2004 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2024 | Jul 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
8082_1359018606.jpg I really enjoy long walks especially when they are taken by people I don't like!:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_8082.jpg |
Moderator
|
| Quote: number 6 "Quote: number 6 "Fash didn't move his body really. Percival had hold of him, and Taylor controlled the player going to ground. Fash cannot move his position.'"
exactly, worse case scenario was a fine, but even the panel could see he was in a position of no fault of his own, makes Wilkin and Peacock look a bit foolish too claiming it was a red all day!'"
Just shows that they both talk absolute poop, I said at the time you only have to look at Fash to see both his arms are trapped in between his body and Percivals, even Percival had hold of Fash so how any of those eejits on the BBC couldn't see that just shows they lack any credence and ability to be impartial.
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 3323 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2011 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2024 | Jun 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
All men are created equal, some work harder in preseason.
-[i:1c45x4hd]Emmitt Smith[/i:1c45x4hd]: |
|
| Quote: Hasbag "Cator - No tripping motion was made.
So why did they get a penalty for it?
A lot of the time the MRP minutes show up how many decisions the refs really get wrong, bit rarely do they get dropped.'"
Think it’s a vicious cycle with refs. The more they face dissent and consequence, the harder recruitment and retention gets, and the standard drops even lower. We really are in a sorry state when Thaler is the best ref now.
| | |
| |
|
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM
You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.
Please Support RLFANS.COM
2.822265625:5
|
|
POSTS | ONLINE | REGISTRATIONS | RECORD | 19.6M +2 | 3,255 ↑40 | 80,085 | 14,103 |
| LOGIN HERE or REGISTER for more features!.
When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
|
RLFANS Match Centre
Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1 | | PLD | F | A | DIFF | PTS |
Wigan |
15 |
427 |
170 |
257 |
26 |
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Warrington |
17 |
436 |
231 |
205 |
24 |
St.Helens |
16 |
429 |
170 |
259 |
22 |
Hull KR |
16 |
397 |
217 |
180 |
22 |
Salford |
16 |
317 |
308 |
9 |
22 |
Catalans |
16 |
304 |
234 |
70 |
20 |
|
Leeds |
17 |
309 |
316 |
-7 |
18 |
Huddersfield |
16 |
298 |
365 |
-67 |
12 |
Leigh |
15 |
270 |
250 |
20 |
11 |
Castleford |
16 |
246 |
435 |
-189 |
9 |
Hull FC |
16 |
218 |
496 |
-278 |
4 |
LondonB |
16 |
156 |
615 |
-459 |
2 |
Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1 | | PLD | F | A | DIFF | PTS |
Wakefield |
14 |
520 |
154 |
366 |
28 |
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Sheffield |
14 |
382 |
217 |
165 |
22 |
Bradford |
14 |
353 |
230 |
123 |
19 |
Toulouse |
13 |
344 |
186 |
158 |
17 |
Widnes |
14 |
327 |
269 |
58 |
15 |
Featherstone |
14 |
396 |
283 |
113 |
14 |
|
Doncaster |
14 |
257 |
341 |
-84 |
13 |
York |
15 |
339 |
305 |
34 |
12 |
Batley |
14 |
217 |
320 |
-103 |
12 |
Swinton |
14 |
284 |
344 |
-60 |
10 |
Halifax |
14 |
270 |
405 |
-135 |
10 |
Whitehaven |
14 |
266 |
424 |
-158 |
10 |
Barrow |
13 |
215 |
393 |
-178 |
10 |
Dewsbury |
15 |
184 |
439 |
-255 |
2 |
|