So Clubb’s penalty was reduced as whatever was said was “in the heat of the moment”. Don’t understand that. What had gone on? He was playing rugby; it’s his job.
With regard to Farrell’s head high tackle some people suggest there was no comparison with Connor’s tackle. What are they suggesting? That he executed it with such precision that he knew no damage would be done. The penalty should be for the act, not the outcome.

The usual standard of punditry from Bob.

Hmmmmm....... curiously absent since Saturday - I wonder why he hasn't been back on?

Just like the poster who appeared after every game last season to explain why we lost.

Never used to offer his/her analysis when we won.