This is what a lot of us have been saying for a year or two now, you can't have Shaul and Sneyd as two of your pivots as neither are creative enough or have that good a passing game.

Having Reynolds with Connor as FB, makes our passing much faster and accurate, there is no way Shaul would have put Griffin through that gap.

We do lose some pace, so would love to see Hodgson working wit Shaul to improve his passing and decision making in the opposition's 20, this would gives us even more competition for places.

Yep i would be happy if we were missing the same number as you guys .

He's out for up to 6 weeks https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/56662895

He's out for up to 6 weeks https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/56662895

The chances of Sneyd and JR being able to play together 75% of the season are already about shot

This is the reality and we need a 6 to slot in

I’d use Jake at 6 - I really would but BH will make the call

Is anyone better at 6 then Jake compared to who’s better at 1 covering Jake
It’s a % thing I suppose

Interesting - at least we have Fev for the new 6-7 partnership to bed in

I would really love to know where you have seen that Jake is the best option at 6, because I, and everyone else I've spoken to, believe that whilst Jake might be wanting to cement the No6 shirt, he's yet to prove on the pitch that that is his best position. He's had many chances over the last couple of years, yet has proved time and again that his natural flare is far better suited to the centre and full back spots.

It's so refreshing to see Brett doing what we've all wanted for a long time, and that's simply replacing Josh with another player without uprooting several players in the process. Keep the spine as settled as possible and bring Ben in, he's shown that he's more than capable of the challenge.