I posted on a different thread, that some fans are happy with one offs. Sneyd's drop goal to potentially win the game would be lauded, yet his missed tackle attempts, poor last tackle kicks, and his inability to create anywhere near the level of chances in the opposition 20 that our competitors halves do would be forgotten about.

Shaul backing up (finally!) would overshadow the blind alley's he runs into, the space he takes away from his centre and his winger on shift plays, compared to our competitors full backs.

If we praise them, we need to criticise their deficiencies too. When Wigan fans are coming on to the forum last week and saying that Shaul is the issue with our attacking structure, it says a lot

Unless Purtill came in and said, "yeah, those structures are fantastic - keep them"

Seems like he has been cast aside as it was an AP decision and LR was reluctant to get the help

I read in the media, that AP wanted an external appointment for an attack coach, LR said, there was nothing in the budget for a new backroom coach. meaning Radford wanted one of his mate's to be added to the staff.
I listened to Dave Woods's podcast, with Radford & Last, they seem to be joined at the hip.
As Last said "Lee's got my back, and I've got his" - maybe Purtill is/was a threat to Last's position..

We are starting to get into the realms of wild speculation and conspiracy here.

Yes but it's a fact that Radford & Last assassinated JFK, and blew up the Twin Towers.
It's only a matter of time before their outed.

Yes it is all getting a bit scarrie