Quote: Mrs Barista "If you were aware that some had greater achievements than others then it seems odd to suggest 68% / 83% as inappropriate. Perhaps you wanted to negatively spin it by saying we've left "only 17% for another 10 or so" which is an exaggeration, and then compound with a comment about breeding complacency. Most responses so far appear to be aligned to the viewpoint that 68% / 83% given a few exceptional performers in there is OK.'"
I was asking a question and asking for opinions. I don't do spin, but as ever you go completely overboard to make a non existent point. Haven't you got some beans to count rather than looking for reactions on here?