No Bumpy is an embittered fool. The salary split up is similar to most clubs. Maybe Wigan, who have a lot of young, up & coming home grown players on their roster can distribute it more more evenly but that option isn't available to most clubs. Even then if these players become really good then they still would have to offload some to maintain that distribution.

No doubt Radford will eventually be moved out - probably following a run of indifferent results just like the vast majority of those that coach at top level. If you look at the history of any club not many coaches left because they were doing too well so simple odds say most appointments end in tears. Following those odds and predicting a coaches demise doesn't show any great insight at all, its happened to a lot of very good ones. In this city two of the most successful of all coaches, Arthur Bunting & Roger Millward left in rather sad circumstances in the end - did that make them rubbish?

No it isn't.
And such a boring hypothesized thread.

Your contribution certainly adds that extra sparkle. Congrats.

Better than BS and hypothesized figures that some seem to hang there hats on as believable.
Then lo and behold an utter fantasy thread transcends fuelled by instant experts.
Congrats.

Goodness me. A contradiction in terms that a thread you just deemed so boring can agitate you so. Perhaps the club can publish a register of player salaries to fully address the initial question about appropriateness of distribution without the need to apply some basic common sense assumptions.

How would knowing individual salaries answer the original question? We know that the best 17 earn 83% of our salary cap so knowing each players' salary would make no difference