Quote: Jake the Peg "I, as most on here, are well aware of the career histories and capabilities of our players and therefore have no need for a potted history of each. It may be your accounting personality or an attempt to condescend (or both perhaps) but it's typical of your posting style
OK thanks for the reply'"
If you were aware that some had greater achievements than others then it seems odd to suggest 68% / 83% as inappropriate. Perhaps you wanted to negatively spin it by saying we've left "only 17% for another 10 or so" which is an exaggeration, and then compound with a comment about breeding complacency. Most responses so far appear to be aligned to the viewpoint that 68% / 83% given a few exceptional performers in there is OK.