Clarke wasn't even Wire's best player that match either IMO (Ratchford was)

Agree, when they went down to 12 Ratchford sparked their rival.

The best way to decide the M.o.M is to ask someone out of the crowd who clearly knows nothing about the game to give his or her verdict. How about the match sponsor?

It's another little change that Sky have made that is so amateurish,at least tell us who the panel consists of.With the Warrington M.O.M. i would think it would be someone with past affiliations to the Warrington camp.They can't think up daft gimmicks quick enough They want to watch Vossy and co on the NRL, you get a good match report and no constant rewinds to past incidents,and no daft gimmicks.

Seems daft but the thing I like most about the coverage of our game with St George was when there was a replay to be shown it was played in the bottom corner of the screen while still showing the game being played. Sky could learn a lot from the NRL coverage, only daft little things like that but they make it a lot better to watch.

I was at a match when a Hull player left the field injured with a bit less than 20 mins to play and didn't return. Hull were beaten by over 30 points in their worst ever defeat at that venue yet he still won the MOM in a canter.