What gets me with this rule is that it assumes that the obstructed player is actually going to stop the try being scored. There are a number of other Leeds players over there who are very capable of stopping the try but don't and the ball is thrown like 20 metres away from the obstructed man so it is unlikely that he was going to get over there in time anyway. Lets say he was obstructed for a second, if he wasn't he probably wouldn't have affected the try anyway.
QuoteknockersbumpMKII="knockersbumpMKII"The touch judge is blind, absolute disgrace!'"
you right but once again it came from a stupid penalty we give in their 10 .
The number of times we do the same thing give away the penalty and concede a try.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
